Feds make rule changes for mortgage brokers

The New York Times Lynnley Browning writes about new compensation rules from The Federal Reserve that will affect compensation of mortgages. According to the new rules, borrowers who use brokers “will most likely pay less for their services” and “be offered the lowest possible interest rate and fees for which they qualify.”

Small banks and credit unions which do not fund loans from their resources will also be covered by the rule change.

"But most banks and other direct lenders, including the few mortgage companies that function like banks, are exempt.

“The new rule is known as the Loan Originator Compensation amendment to Regulation Z, part of a strengthened Truth in Lending Act passed by Congress in 2008. Designed to prevent consumers from being steered into high-cost, risky loans, it covers how a loan originator — or any person or company that arranges, obtains and/or negotiates a mortgage for a client — is paid.

“Under the new rule, a lender can no longer pay a loan originator a lucrative rebate known as a yield-spread premium, which is tied to the rate or terms of the mortgage. Banks and other lenders can continue to pay commissions to brokers, but these payments must now be based solely on the loan amount.

“In the past, the higher the interest rate and points, the more money a broker stood to “earn.'"

How does this work?

“Brokerage firms typically earn a yield-spread premium of 1.5 to 2.5 percent of the loan amount, with higher-rate loans paying closer to 2.5 percent. The brokerage and its broker, or loan officer, typically split the rebate. On a $400,000 loan at 5.25 percent, that might total $8,000, based on two points paid, with a point being 1 percent of the loan amount.

“In the new system, the brokerage can earn a fixed commission from the lender, but the amount is not tied to the loan terms. Also, the brokerage cannot pass on a part of the commission to the broker, who must now be paid an hourly wage or salary. The exception is for loans where the lender pays the borrower’s points to the brokerage, typically for higher-rate loans. (The commission range is expected to be 1.5 to 2.5 points.) “

A new day for consumers may be dawning, but you still have to keep a wary eye open for charges, hidden and disclosed, when applying for that mortgage.

Read the full report.

For your next title order or

if you have questions about what you see here, contact

Stephen M. Flatow, Esq.

Vested Title Inc.

165 Passaic Avenue, Suite 101

Fairfield, NJ 07004

Tel 973-808-6130 - Fax 201-656-4506

E-mail vti@vested.com - www.vested.com

Sphere: Related Content

Calculating the Annual Percentage Rate

The New York Times’ Lynnley Browning is a little off his fine writing in this article dealing with the annual percentage rate calculations required by lenders.

THE lending industry has tried to make it easier for borrowers to understand the true cost of a mortgage by disclosing both its interest rate and its annual percentage rate, or A.P.R. But consumers may often wonder which figure they should focus on when buying or refinancing a property.

This is the first mistake in Browning’s report. It was not the lending industry that focused on making a loan’s true cost understandable, it was the folks in Washington, D.C. who promulgated the Truth-in-Lending Act.

The answer, many mortgage experts say, may seem counter intuitive: while the A.P.R. is popularly seen as providing a more complete picture of what you are actually paying each month, it often omits some costs.

Yes, that’s true, but what is overlooked is the underlying premise of the APR—that all lenders will have to calculate the APR the same way. There never was a promise that consumers would have to do some homework in figuring out which loan was best for them.

“When someone calls for a quote, we always give the interest rate, not the A.P.R.,” said Melissa Cohn, the president of the Manhattan Mortgage Company, a brokerage firm. “The A.P.R. is not all-inclusive.”

Whoa, if they did that in print, it would be a violation of Federal law.

When you read the full report you will see that the argument is being made for the further dumbing down of the loan process by including ALL costs in the APR calculation. In reality that sounds like a plan that would work, but by lumping in costs that are fixed in the marketplace, such as, mortgage tax in NY, and those that vary by company, for example, credit checks, you create a scene that is ripe for errors.

For your next title order or

if you have questions about what you see here, contact

Stephen M. Flatow, Esq.

Vested Title Inc.

165 Passaic Avenue, Suite 101

Fairfield, NJ 07004

Tel 973-808-6130 - Fax 201-656-4506

E-mail vti@vested.com - www.vested.com

Sphere: Related Content