Mortgage foreclosure settlement – a solution?

Sarah Portlock writing in The Star-Ledger reports on the settlement of the New Jersey Supreme Court’s involvement in the mortgage foreclosure crisis. The settlement “will require six of the country’s biggest mortgage lenders to disclose the specifics of how they foreclose on homeowners has been” court approved.

“Under the agreement, retired Judge Richard Williams will review the lenders’ foreclosure processes to ensure all filed documents are based on personal knowledge and accurate business records. He also has the power to periodically review a sample of future foreclosures.”

Nonsense. Can anyone define “personal knowledge” in the day of e-commerce where everything, absolutely everything is compiled, kept and disseminated electronically? We no longer live in the days of bookkeepers wearing eyeshades sitting hunchbacked over ledger books.

“The settlement was made public two weeks ago, and comes four months after Chief Justice Stuart Rabner issued a three-part initiative to investigate what could be rogue foreclosure filings, noting a staggering increase in caseload and concerns judges had inadvertently "rubber stamped" files that had inadequate or inaccurate paperwork. In response, the banks argued they had already revised their foreclosure procedures.”

Read - Judge approves settlement to review mortgage foreclosure process

For your next title order or

if you have questions about what you see here, contact

Stephen M. Flatow, Esq.

Vested Title Inc.

165 Passaic Avenue, Suite 101

Fairfield, NJ 07004

Tel 973-808-6130 - Fax 201-656-4506

E-mail vti@vested.com - www.vested.com

Sphere: Related Content

Mortgage lenders fight back on foreclosure abuse cases

NJ.com picks up an AP story on the New Jersey Supreme Court’s get tough attitude in foreclosure abuse cases. 6 of the biggest mortgage lenders say N.J. high court overstepped its boundaries

“State Supreme Court Chief Justice Stuart Rabner made a splash in December when he ordered six of the nation's biggest mortgage lenders into court to show why their foreclosure operations shouldn't be suspended over reports of widespread irregularities.

“State attorneys general around the country have increased pressure on lenders over the past year, but New Jersey is believed to be the first state whose Supreme Court has stepped into the fray so boldly.

“Too boldly, according to the banks' court filings. With the court hearing looming next month, the banks say they'd already begun remedial action months before New Jersey's court order and that suspending their operations would damage already shaky housing markets and lead to further deterioration of hard-hit neighborhoods.”

The legal argument centers on constitutional issues. Mainly, “the order violates due process and equal protection clauses because it targets six lenders while omitting others and doesn't arise from any specific complaints, according to the filings.”

The court is trying to "remedy what it perceives as a public policy issue," attorneys for Ally Financial's GMAC Mortgage unit wrote. "Such powers are the province of legislators and regulators."

The lenders targeted by the court’s order are GMAC Mortgage, OneWest Bank, formerly IndyMac Federal Bank; BAC Home Loan Servicing, a subsidiary of Bank of America; JP Morgan Chase's Chase Home Finance; Wells Fargo Financial New Jersey and CitiResidential Living, a subsidiary of Citibank. The companies process almost half of New Jersey’s foreclosure actions.

This may seem as good news for borrowers in foreclosure, but all it does is delay the inevitable.

Read the full story.

For your next title order or

if you have questions about what you see here, contact

Stephen M. Flatow, Esq.

Vested Title Inc.

165 Passaic Avenue, Suite 101

Fairfield, NJ 07004

Tel 973-808-6130 - Fax 201-656-4506

E-mail vti@vested.com - www.vested.com

Sphere: Related Content