Showing posts with label servicers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label servicers. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Not only borrowers were hurt by sloppy mortgage servicing.

In her Sunday Times Fair Game column, Opening the Bag of Mortgage Tricks, Gretchen Morgenson writes about an untold story of sloppy mortgage servicing practices—the impact on mortgage investors.
“[B]orrowers aren’t the only ones concerned about potential mischief. Investors who hold mortgage securities are increasingly worried that servicers may be putting their interests ahead of those who own the loans.
“A servicer might, for example, deny a loan modification to a borrower because it also owns a second mortgage on the same property and doesn’t want to write down that asset, as required in a modification. Levying outsize default fees is another tactic — the fees typically go to the servicer, not the lender, but they can still propel a property into foreclosure more quickly. And foreclosures aren’t a good outcome for investors. “
The result in once such case was a federal jury’s award to investors of several millions of dollars in punitive damages.

How did it happen?

After a mortgage servicing company collapsed, a “small firm called Compass Partners bought the servicing rights to these assets for $8 million. A short time later, Silar Advisors, a company overseen by Robert Leeds, a former Goldman Sachs executive, got involved by financing Compass. Compass/Silar began servicing the loans for the investors.”

“Almost immediately, the plaintiffs in the suit contended, Compass/Silar started siphoning off money owed to investors holding the loans. Among the servicer’s tactics, the plaintiffs said, were improperly charging default interest, late fees and loan origination fees that reduced amounts due to investors.”
In addition, when borrowers tried to renegotiate or pay-off defaulted loans, the servicing company refused to negotiate. “In other cases when Compass/Silar urged the investors to modify troubled mortgages, the servicer reaped undisclosed fees in the deals.”

“A Silar spokesman said the firm was pleased that the jury awarded only $79,000 in compensatory damages to the plaintiffs but was disappointed by the punitive-damages assessment. “The jurors are to be commended for their careful consideration of the facts in a very lengthy trial,” the spokesman said. He declined to comment as to whether Silar was currently servicing any loans.”
“It is obvious that we are in the litigation stage of the financial debacle of 2008. That usually means shining the light on dark corners and watching what scurries away. The view may not be pretty, but at least in this case, investors got some recompense in addition to an education.”
A former employer gave me this saying about the business place - In some markets the bulls eat, in some the bears eat, but the pigs always get the garbage.

What do you think?

Read the full column, Opening the Bag of Mortgage Tricks.


For your next title order or
if you have questions about what you see here, contact
Stephen M. Flatow, Esq.
Vested Title Inc.
165 Passaic Avenue, Suite 101
Fairfield, NJ 07004
Tel 973-808-6130 - Fax 201-656-4506
E-mail vti@vested.com - www.vested.com
Sphere: Related Content

Monday, August 16, 2010

Mortgage servicers take on two roles, and the homeowner pays

In her column, Fair Game, in the Sunday New York Times, Gretchen Morgenson lays bare a possible reason that homeowners are not getting approved for mortgage modifications—the folks who make those decisions also own junior liens that may be prejudiced by those decisions.

Morgenson introduces you to Brad Miller, a Democratic representative from North Carolina with a background in consumer law.  “This past March, Mr. Miller introduced a bill that would eliminate one of the most pernicious conflicts of interest in banking today: the dueling roles played by the big mortgage servicers.”
“When borrowers are defaulting in droves, as they are now, loan servicing becomes much more complex and laborious. Servicers must chase delinquent borrowers for payments and otherwise manage these uneasy relationships, possibly into foreclosure.

“So where does the conflict of interest lie? Often, the same bank that services a primary mortgage owned by another institution also owns a second mortgage or home equity line of credit on the same property. When that borrower has trouble meeting both payments, the servicer has an interest in making sure that amounts owed on the second lien, which it owns, continue to be paid even if the first loan, which it has no interest in, slides into delinquency. About two-thirds of primary mortgages are serviced by banks who do not own them but hold the accompanying seconds.”
Miller has some good ideas but knows it will be an uphill fight.  We’ll keep you posted.

Read the full story.


Your comments are welcome.


For your next title order or 
if you have questions about what you see here,
contact Stephen M. Flatow 
Vested Title Inc. 
648 Newark Avenue, P.O. Box 6453, 
Jersey City, NJ 07306 
Tel 201-656-9220 - Fax 201-656-4506 
E-mail vti@vested.com - www.vested.com
Sphere: Related Content